+- NordInvasion Forum (https://forum.nordinvasion.com)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Community Projects (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+---- Forum: Feature Requests (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=77)
+---- Thread: Rollback before the Legendary essence/dust (/showthread.php?tid=81555)
RE: Rollback before the Legendary essence/dust - Leques - 03-07-2025
you all are crazy thinking this is better system, its basic math to know this is absolute shite
RE: Rollback before the Legendary essence/dust - Julia. - 03-07-2025
Please keep it a respectful discussion, thanks!
RE: Rollback before the Legendary essence/dust - Venom - 03-07-2025
(03-07-2025, 01:09 PM)BlackSniper Wrote: I agree with Never. No need to bump the discussion. If developers were interested they would’ve responded. Going back breaks the economy and I think many people (including me) prefer the new system anyways.
I agree with both u too
RE: Rollback before the Legendary essence/dust - Renji - 03-07-2025
It was easier to upgrade volcs with old system, but with new system I can throw trash into furnace and upgrade either volcs or some other joke item. My suggestion is some bosses drop upgrade kits (very rare). Thanks.
RE: Rollback before the Legendary essence/dust - Berkay - 03-07-2025
It would've been more precise whether the system was going to work or not if the thoughts of only certain people hadn't been taken. Therefore, test patch notes could be an idea that can easily erase the potential negative sides of upcoming updates.
RE: Rollback before the Legendary essence/dust - Malong - 03-07-2025
(03-07-2025, 10:36 PM)Berkay Wrote: It would've been more precise whether the system was going to work or not if the thoughts of only certain people hadn't been taken. Therefore, test patch notes could be an idea that can easily erase the potential negative sides of upcoming updates.
Not happening. Despite having people who work on this game being very experienced players of other games that undoubtedly do this.
P.S. Throwback to when I suggested this in 2018:
(14-03-2018, 03:42 PM)Malong Wrote: [*]Lack of a public test server. Ideally, this would have the deployment of a release candidate branch. Check-ins with the features that pass testing get merged into master and eventually tagged for release. Also, publicly available test notes (example here) that accompany the features of the release candidate.