+- NordInvasion Forum (https://forum.nordinvasion.com)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Off Topic (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=20)
+---- Forum: Videos (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=74)
+---- Thread: We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook (/showthread.php?tid=32481)
Pages:
1
2
We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook - greekdragonkdl - 02-12-2014
[color=maroon]
We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook (Documentary)
Note - This documentary was originally released through Vimeo on November 30th, 2014 and was taken down at around noon PST today (December 1st, 2014). It was up for only 16 hours, garnered over 10,000 views during that time, and was taken down due to a "harassment" claim from an organization called the HONR network (honr.com), which is a group dedicated to censoring videos that challenge the mainstream narrative of certain events such as Sandy Hook, 9/11, Aurora, the Boston Bombing, and more.
UPDATE - The most viewed YouTube mirror of the documentary, which was uploaded by the user PlasmaBurns, has now been removed due to a copyright complaint issued by Lenny Pozner. The documentary still remains available through the Media Solidarity's main YouTube channel however. (12/2/2014)
The major media outlets don't provide us with unvarnished, meaningful news and the result is a nation of people with very limited understanding of events taking place in their world. What little they do know is a combination of falacies and trivial points that aren't sufficient to form a useful world view. As we see it Sandy Hook is an issue important enough that every American should have a detailed account of the event available to them. And we're talking about full disclosure.
Public officials at the highest levels of American government can and sometimes do engage in conspiracies to manipulate elections, wiretap and smear critics, mislead Congress and the public. Despite being labeled, conspiracy theories they warrant scientific inquiry.
The challenge for everyday Americans is to engage in serious study of the subject despite organized efforts to ridicule or discredit them and without appearing foolish or contributing to mass paranoia. Since 9/11, no event has spawned more conspiracy theories that have been met with coordinated efforts to discredit them than Sandy Hook. The idiom, "If you're not catching flak, you're not over the target." if applied to Sandy Hook speculation indicates there's something there they wish to protect.
Immediately after the events of December 14th, 2012 the speculation began that what was being reported was not the truth. Although many anomylous reports were deemed to be innocent mistakes, a pile of unexplainable oddities began to grow. In the first days after the event, the public was told to give it some time for the facts to emerge. When those facts didn't make a dent in the pile of oddities, the public was told to wait for the investigation to get underway. When, throughout those many months more questions emerged than were answered the public was told to wait for the final report. That report has been released. There are no further milestones to wait for in the hopes that the quesions will be answered. We have reached a proverbial dead-end and each day that passes means public interest drops as they grow more comfortable with not knowing the truth.
It is this situation in which we find ourselves and the reason why a diverse group of independent journalists have come together to raise awareness of the issue and encourage the public to act. Despite our many differences of opinion, we all agree that this event has been and will continue to be of such historical significance that the true details must be revealed.
I highly encourage EVERYONE to watch through this ENTIRE documentary and keep an open mind. Do not dismiss what is being presented before actually listening to all of it. I know it is a long video to get through, but I believe it is incredibly important to finish watching it all. Try watching it in segments if you are unable to do it all in one sitting.
Direct YouTube link to documentary - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2eVq2DWneQ
Link to Independent Media Solidarity website - http://mediasolidarity.com
This original post will be edited and updated with a mirrored link to the documentary should it be removed by YouTube as well.
Re: We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook - Timmix - 02-12-2014
Wow
Re: We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook - WS_Ryan - 02-12-2014
nice to see people not accepting the mainstream medias view of things cos don't forget the mainstream media has an agenda too.
Re: We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook - TheBaker - 02-12-2014
Now, im not normally one to believe things like this, but i'm only 30mins into the documentary(ofc going to watch it all) and it is already becoming very interesting. The dash cam in the troopers car, that was very interesting as it matched with the times and was in the optimum place to see any children crossing, especially as the photo showed just after had them crossing right in front of were the vehicle was. Then the date cache being on the 13 and that journalist contacting 2 separate employees to confirm it was correct, very weird. Going to watch the rest
Re: We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook - Irolltwenties - 02-12-2014
Sandy Hook was just another false flag. The media is obviously complicit. It's not just Sandy Hook, it's social engineering on a massive scale.
Re: We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook - greekdragonkdl - 02-12-2014
(02-12-2014, 05:49 PM)Bearstronaut link Wrote:Sandy Hook was just another false flag. The media is obviously complicit. It's not just Sandy Hook, it's social engineering on a massive scale.
You are absolutely correct
My biggest issue with this documentary so far is the failure to include the peculiar parent reactions (there are tons), as well as the coroner's ridiculous interview. Some of them have said that it wasn't included because that information has already been out there and looked at a ton already, but I don't think that is a good excuse. A lot of people (myself included) initially heard about the event just briefly and didn't spend very much time looking into it at first, so not everyone does know about the odd reactions and interviews.
Re: We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook - Renji - 03-12-2014
some guy posted this in the comments on the independentmediasolidarity website
CONSPIRCY THEORIES??
WHO WERE THE VERY FIRST PEOPLE TO POSIT A CONSPIRACY THEORY?
#1 THE OBAMA GOVERNMENT
#2 THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA
The first report of the incident was an interruption to normal
broadcasting. The very first verifiable piece of physical
evidence reported by the media doing the breaking news was
that “.223 caliber casings were found on the floor.”
NOT an assault rifle. NOT an AR-15. Not a Bushmaster AR-15.
But .223 caliber casings that are almost identical to 5.56
NATO rounds used all over the world. I have watched eough
crime reporting to onow that the ONLY time bullet casings are
reported are when there are no victims or bullets found at the
scene.
Not even a report about blood. Why?
They had already decided, beforehand, that they would blame an
AR-15, and not just any brand but a Bushmaster brand AR-15 so
that they could issue a specific ban on it. Why Bushmaster?
For the same reason you report McDonalds. You go after the
country’s largest maker of what you want to ban.
The presence of .223 casings – with no mention if they were
even fired recently – became the most pressing fact of what
was supposed to be a horrific mass murder of little kids.
NEXT came the announcement of a “GLOCK and a semi-automatic
9mm” found at the scene. AGAIN, if GLOCK is not the largest
manufacturer of handguns in the world, it is the most
well-known. It is repeated on TV as if no other guns are like
it. Except that GLOCKs are “semi-automatic” and fire every
handgun round including the most popular, “9mm.” This is like
saying, “WE found a PRIUS at the scene along with a compact
4-door electric hybrid.”
Later on, we heard that the “semi-automatic 9mm” was a
Sig-Sauer “semi-automatic 9mm” and that the GLOCK was also a
“semi-automatic 9mm,” in addition to the Bushmaster AR-15 –
which was not in the school but in the locked trunk of Lanza’s
Honda.
When they opened the trunk, they saw a shotgun and started
clearing it of rounds instead of checking the safety and
sealing it in a bag or box for evidence. We would subsequently
learn that NO AR-15 was found nor ANY OTHER WEAPON capable of
firing .223 rounds. If they found 7.62 caliber casings on the
floor, would they immediately blame an AK-47, despite the
seven different sizes of a 7.62 casing?
Finally, the last word on weapons found were FOUR handguns, NO
assault rifle. But, the government and media were still well
into their blitz on assault rifles. Four handguns with
ten-round magazines each makes firing forty bullets easier
than having to reload an assault rifle with a seond 30-round
magazine.
BUT, H. Wayne Carver, the alleged experienced coroner, with
over 35 years of experience, claimed that all children were
shot with the “long gun” which, of course, did not exist.
CONAPIRACY THEORY?
Sure sounds like a Media conspiracy theory to me, who cannot
get their lies straight.
Ask ANY State Prosecutor if he or she would have enough
forensic evidence to charge anyone with anything, let alone 28
murders.
NOT ONE CORPUS DELECTI.
NOT ONE SECOND OF SURVEILLANCE VIDEO
NOT ONE DROP OF BLOOD
NOT ONE BULLET HOLE IN A SCHOOL WINDOW OR DOOR
And speaking of casings, if there were “EAR-witness reports”
or “hjundreds of shots being fired,” then why were no 9mm
casings found on the floor? The guns identify what caliber
they use, so one does not need a casing to identify it.
Yet, the floor is filled with .223 casings – cooroborating the
lying coroner’s report – but not a single 9mm casing or spent
shell was found at the scene?
You would think that with all their gun-brand specificity,
they would have announced the brand of the ammo as well.
Except that this might give away the name of the government
contractor whosupplied 1.6 billion rounds of hollow-point ammo
to all of their departments, including NOAA, NASA, Social
Security, Medicaid, and the bulk going to FEMA – not DHS
“Curiouser and curiouser,” said Alice in Wonderland.
(copied, not my punctuation or spelling used)
Re: We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook - greekdragonkdl - 03-12-2014
There is also no evidence or description from witnesses of what the shooter looked like either. Supposedly every single person who saw Adam Lanza in the school died, except for two: the school nurse, and Rick Thorne (a custodian). We've already seen contradicting reports from the nurse (Sally Cox), but there is not a single interview with Rick Thorne. We only know him from a 911 call, in which he supposedly confronted Adam Lanza face to face and told him to stop and drop his weapon. Why was Rick Thorne never interviewed or brought up in mainstream media discussion if he was such a hero that day? Those actions were far more heroic than creepy Gene Rosen's.
Re: We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook - Looter - 03-12-2014
Its a shame what the american people have turned into, believing the first word anyone "official" says without thinking twice about it, this included me as well at one point. Thanks for posting the video, i was unaware of this one.
Re: We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook - Weiner - 04-12-2014
Unbelievable :-\