+- NordInvasion Forum (https://forum.nordinvasion.com)
+-- Forum: Discussions (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Forum: Community Projects (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+---- Forum: Feature Requests (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=77)
+---- Thread: Regimes (/showthread.php?tid=7715)
Pages:
1
2
Regimes - Gashy - 22-02-2013
A regime is an alliance between multiple houses. Regimes may emerge out of house crafting interests or out of desire to consolidate wealth. In a regime all leaders of the included houses have an equal say in the agenda and protocol of how it will function.
Adding this may give houses across international borders a greater incentive to cooperate with one another in order to attain a constant expansion of all houses included at all hours of the day.
Also this will encourage houses to work together rather than just talk shit about one another all day.
Think of it as an exercise in teamwork on a global scale. This idea is open to interpretation and I would love to hear any suggestions to making it better.
Re: Regimes - WheresMyVodka - 22-02-2013
me likey
Re: Regimes - Sir_Aragorn - 22-02-2013
Love this Idea
Re: Regimes - Huscarlton Banks - 22-02-2013
I'm a bit curious as to what functions a "regime" would provide, besides making it seem more official that the houses involved are allies.
Re: Regimes - Sir_Aragorn - 22-02-2013
(22-02-2013, 03:10 AM)Huscarlton Banks link Wrote: I'm a bit curious as to what functions a "regime" would provide, besides making it seem more official that the houses involved are allies.
More house Cooperation, Less heated rivalries among some members and maybe some grand events.
Also when it comes to cooperation among houses, new members of different houses will associate with one another, bringing along new relationships in NI.
Edit: Some other name ideas: Division, Army, Brigade.
Re: Regimes - Barristan - 22-02-2013
What exactly do you want from us, surely the best place for such a thing is on the forum.
Re: Regimes - Sir_Aragorn - 22-02-2013
(22-02-2013, 03:36 AM)Barristan link Wrote: What exactly do you want from us, surely the best place for such a thing is on the forum.
No, the real question is [Image: 25999004.jpg]
Re: Regimes - WheresMyVodka - 22-02-2013
But I'm worried about the combining of supper powers
Re: Regimes - Gashy - 22-02-2013
(22-02-2013, 03:36 AM)Barristan link Wrote: What exactly do you want from us, surely the best place for such a thing is on the forum.
Perhaps a board in which regimes can be declared and formulated not unlike houses? If yes, I could create a sticky which highlights the parameters of this idea in greater detail.
(22-02-2013, 03:10 AM)Huscarlton Banks link Wrote: I'm a bit curious as to what functions a "regime" would provide, besides making it seem more official that the houses involved are allies.
All houses that lack outright hostility towards one another are pretty much "allies". This system would make alliances a concrete aspect of house relations and would suggest greater teamwork and cooperation between houses. Think of what SB and PK were before they merged. That would essentially constitute a regime.
It also entails that houses needn't be forced to merge in order to work closely with one another.
Re: Regimes - Olaf the Lazy - 22-02-2013
Like Monopoly said, I worry about this just creating a gap between the large Houses and the newer up and coming houses. What incentive would the big houses get from allying themselves with the newer ones?