Official Report on PCK/Malong & Pyra - Printable Version +- NordInvasion Forum (https://forum.nordinvasion.com) +-- Forum: Help & Administration (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: Administration (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +---- Forum: Report Players (https://forum.nordinvasion.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=82) +---- Thread: Official Report on PCK/Malong & Pyra (/showthread.php?tid=78718) Pages:
1
2
|
RE: Official Report on PCK/Malong & Pyra - Malong - 19-07-2024 This wasn't civil, also you were online earlier than I was yesterday (and thus was online for longer): RE: Official Report on PCK/Malong & Pyra - Spek - 20-07-2024 Cant we all just get along and enjoy NI? RE: Official Report on PCK/Malong & Pyra - Egil - 20-07-2024 (19-07-2024, 06:32 PM)Alahrian Wrote: Incident Overview As PCK already stated it wasnt him who started this, it was me. After they wiped several times on hard, they joined our normal run and I typed something like "imagine having strong cades, you could do hard runs with ease." This led to a poor defensive argument on their side and thus started the dispute. The very next run the CC guys and PCK had a discussion about this. I meanwhile went silent because I no longer saw any point in this conversation. However, PCK was being quite rational and logical in his arguments and apparently the CC guys couldn't deal with it and went personal by saying something like he has a poor lifestyle. And yet I didnt see him post any reports. Anyway, I have no screenshots to prove this because I didnt think some bullshitting would lead to this kindergarten right now but here we are. But sure if you want to report them, dont forget to report me too for starting this. RE: Official Report on PCK/Malong & Pyra - Soviet - 20-07-2024 (19-07-2024, 07:26 PM)Alahrian Wrote: (...) However i will not chat or interact with you We had that before and it doesnt make sense to discuss with you . (...) Always the same... RE: Official Report on PCK/Malong & Pyra - Consweber - 20-07-2024 (19-07-2024, 09:00 PM)Jean Badou Wrote:(19-07-2024, 06:32 PM)Alahrian Wrote: The conflict began when PCK, mentioned that our clan, Camelot's Court (CC), only possesses heavy wall barricades and not stronger barricades like the strong cade. As a relatively new clan, we prioritized purchasing quality gear over more advanced barricades, which suffice for normal rounds and occasional hard ones. However, PCK, Pyra, and Nervous_Man found this situation amusing and began to mock our clan name and members.CC only having heavy wall barricades is something I figured and pointed out, by watching these cades being built randomly over the maps I played on. It is well known I've been encouraging new players to get either a cheap heavy barricade or directly going for the best "short" barricade, which is the strong barricade. These two have been proven to have the most uses on all runs, mostly because it allows players to jump over them (they also have slightly increased durability compared to wall barricades). In regards to the tomes, CC have on multiple occastions tomed instantaneously for one another on seemingly unnecessary waves with few tomes available and then have subsequently been reluctant to do the same for others (I myself wasn't tomed in for Dortea on the same run they had tomed on wave 5 and 7 I believe). Creating a wonderful amount of irony in this report. |