07-02-2017, 11:27 PM
(07-02-2017, 11:22 PM)GrafBlade Wrote:(07-02-2017, 10:47 PM)Malong Wrote: It's not a good point, my aim was to say both sides of that argument are losing ones. Making a judgement based on how people spend money on their hobbies is as pointless as making a judgement based on how people spend time on their hobbies. It's their choice, and it didn't hurt anyone else anyway.
Also to clarify terminology (yet) again: "pay to win" means the _game_ (not other players) sells advantageous items or bonuses through a subscription or cash shop.
In the end it is just the result that matters in this case. "Pay to win" might not be directly usable as a terminology following the given definition, tho the allowing of external payments from official side (--> rules) creates a similar effect, ceasing with some players getting advantages through cash payments. And therefore we can simply call this p2w as well (or at least compare it with a true p2w system
You literally contradicted yourself in the span of two sentences.
Quote Board is on Discord (last updated 2023.09.07)
"When I feel bad, I read your quote board." - Corndog
Tofu: People call Tricksters racist, yet we have the most Muslim members of any house.
PCK: If Islam is a religion of peace, and Tricksters have the most Muslims, then is House of Tricksters the house of peace?
Falankos: I always knew that we were the good guys.
"When I feel bad, I read your quote board." - Corndog
Tofu: People call Tricksters racist, yet we have the most Muslim members of any house.
PCK: If Islam is a religion of peace, and Tricksters have the most Muslims, then is House of Tricksters the house of peace?
Falankos: I always knew that we were the good guys.