The Infantry Problem 2

[TerrorBite]

It's irrelevant whether it actually occurred (assuming it was on hard or rag)

It actually is. To come to an agreement we need to take both stances in consideration. From cases like the top scoring legionnaire with melee only, we could learn what is needed to achieve such accomplishment. Even if external factors played a role it is still relevant as these factors will help in balancing the final outcome.

Yes but we also know that NI kill count tends to be highly variable and dependent on many factors. The rest of the team could easily have been highly afk, or at least the normal heavy shooters could have been afk for some time. The leg could have also prioritised slashing spot or shooting spot or w/e, and could have been really active. The map could have also been a slow paced one etc. 

The point is it's not unlikely for it to occur, and changing the meta based on ^ assuming it doesn't take away from the rest of the team is unlikely (given this playstyle would have been picked up by others by now automatically from seeing it, or would in the future if it is worthwhile).

---

Regading inf being underpowered if you go to page 1 i think we said it isn't underpowered, but just too specialied in its roles to the extent it's not as fun or versatile. So without making it OP we were looking for ways to improve other aspects of it like more hp.