02-12-2017, 01:37 PM
(02-12-2017, 01:14 PM)TerrorBite Wrote:Of course if shouldn't be dropped. I'll just say it again; all options should be considered. It seems to me that the main discussion keeps coming back to the HP buff, therefor I'm stating my observations.(02-12-2017, 01:00 PM)Kaasovic Wrote: I don't see an issue with something being posted a couple of times, but I am just trying to say that all of these options should be taken in account, not just an HP buff
"and for the record no one has had any arguments for or against extra hp iirc. So should I drop the idea because it has been essentially unnoticed?"
I missed your suggestion because it was only mentioned once(?) and was not discussed either?
(02-12-2017, 01:15 PM)Sir Baron Wrote: What I as trying to say is in a perfect NI every class has to uses
If you mean that all classed need [two] uses I'd like to know why and what those uses would be.
I play how I want and would certainly not be limited to only having two options.
(02-12-2017, 01:15 PM)Sir Baron Wrote: (...)I agree with this, but it usually ends bad.
Infantry have the best chance at being able to win a last ditch scramble
The have the best chance of staying alive after getting tomed in next to a bunch of nords
(02-12-2017, 01:15 PM)Sir Baron Wrote: Also I know there are more whys of helping Infantry then a plain buff and that's what I wantOther classes should not worry about dying in combat easily since they have access to ranged weaponry.
If you just buff Infantry's armor or HP then other classes will start to think they are under powered and it would lead to more buffs until the nords are the only under powered thing here