05-11-2013, 02:55 AM
Battlefield all the way. There are so many satisfying things in Battlefield that CoD can't compete with. For starters, vehicle/urban warfare. Yes CoD has urban warfare by definition, but because of the multiplayer being so fast pace it doesn't simulate well. Battlefield on the other hand, picture an enemy squad held up in the second story floor of a near by armed with LMGs and AT rock launchers. They have suppressed your squads advance into the area. Luckily your team has a LAV that's moved into position and has now blasted a gaping hole in the wall where the enemy was. You don't get that kind of game-play in CoD, which is why my opinion is that battlefield is superior.
SilentKnight: 52 Royal Guard
DeadShot: 52 Sniper Hybrid
Athena: 51 Pikeman
DeadShot: 52 Sniper Hybrid
Athena: 51 Pikeman