19-02-2015, 12:41 AM
every opinion in this thread irritates me.
Why would we want to reduce the number of viable shield bringers?
What about pavise is not good as a shielder?
Why would ranger ever bring tower shield? It would look dumb.
Why would pikeman ever bring tower shield? It would look dumb.
Why does RG need more shield options? Pavise is actually more limited in option (but, by saying this, i don't mean they need more)
Tower shield is a Pavise style shield, it should be usable by X-bows.
Maybe this is a good idea,however, because I don't want someone with shield skill of 4 shielding just because they have a tower; and someone who has made it to hero should hopefully understand if they should be shielding or not.
This is just my opinion.
Why would we want to reduce the number of viable shield bringers?
What about pavise is not good as a shielder?
Why would ranger ever bring tower shield? It would look dumb.
Why would pikeman ever bring tower shield? It would look dumb.
Why does RG need more shield options? Pavise is actually more limited in option (but, by saying this, i don't mean they need more)
Tower shield is a Pavise style shield, it should be usable by X-bows.
Maybe this is a good idea,however, because I don't want someone with shield skill of 4 shielding just because they have a tower; and someone who has made it to hero should hopefully understand if they should be shielding or not.
This is just my opinion.
Characters:
Deerheart: Royal ShielDeer | Eikthyrnir: Antlered Legionnaire | Cernunnos: Pavise ShielDeer | CerynianHind: Master of Pelts | Hart_Or: HalberDeer | Furcifer: Warden of the Wood
Deerheart: Royal ShielDeer | Eikthyrnir: Antlered Legionnaire | Cernunnos: Pavise ShielDeer | CerynianHind: Master of Pelts | Hart_Or: HalberDeer | Furcifer: Warden of the Wood