House

[Malong]

[quote author=Malong link=topic=46021.msg238139#msg238139 date=1438781831]
[quote author=SaxonCamel link=topic=46021.msg238135#msg238135 date=1438780240]
The younger you are the more you will change;  if you're only 14 years old now then that means in the past year you have matured by proportion of 1/13. It's a law of diminishing returns so enjoy it now while you still can.

This is a false equivalence. You are using "change" to be synonymous with "age" (which is fine), but then you use "change" to be synonymous with "mature." Change can occur which does not mature someone.

By your logic, the amount you mature between 13 and 15.1 is equal to the amount you mature from 22 to 25.
[/quote]

I have a bachelors in psychology with social development I think I know what I'm talking about.

Besides why can't maturity be associated with age directly proportionally? If not, then you could use your common sense and apply a constant and assume some proportionality between age and maturity.
[/quote]
Please point out where I posted that maturity could not be associated with age directly proportionally. You are attempting a proof by contradiction using a statement I never made. I guess your program in psychology with social development does not cover basic proofs, /wink.