07-09-2015, 01:35 PM
(07-09-2015, 11:11 AM)Soviet link Wrote: I agree. 69 damage is too much. I don't understand why it should deal more damage than the Durendal, seeing as the length is already a huge bonus. A lot of people already considered it to be better than Durendal before the update.
I agree with this. Durendal was supposed to be the top tier 2h sword but seems outclassed now. TBH the Legacy and VGS were already both better for slashing than Durendal due to the higher reach (although one could have argued that the durendal being faster and higher damage was better). Now there isn't really much room for balance getting the highest damage and 2nd(?) longest reach. If the damage and reach are going to be far higher the speed needs a much more serious nerf. Current stats seem pretty unbalanced atm.
*edit* Thinking about it these stats also don't really make sense considering the model of the Legacy. Why would such a long thin sword be crazy high damage and slow? If the idea was to try out a high damage/length with low speed the AGS model would make far more sense (the stats on it are currently not great either).