15-10-2017, 07:12 AM
(14-10-2017, 07:10 PM)Malong Wrote:(14-10-2017, 05:42 PM)Bobo Wrote: If they are experienced enough with different weaps, they probably can, agreed.
Still, this thread would be damn boring if we wouldn't allow ppl to give their point of view. It would just be simple maths based on stats, so the thread "what is the best x" would have just one reply and no reason to continue.
I prefer it much as it is: different opinions based on different preferations and experiences. Diversity is a foundation that makes the community.
Sometimes I wonder if you post solely to see your count increment by one instead of adding meaningful content. This is one of those times.
No, I just meant to support Baron on the below quoted:
(14-10-2017, 05:06 PM)Malong Wrote:(14-10-2017, 04:55 PM)Sir Baron Wrote: No but all I got from that post is you think I'm stupid for saying stats aren't all
No, but stats are readily available and people can predict performance with abstract thinking.
What is best for one is not for the other as it is not all just in stats, at least not in every case it is so simple. E.g. some archers would prefer damage in their bows while others might value speed more, so for one Stag is the best one and someone else will value Fiendish. Like for 1h some will prefer DWP for the ability to deal against strong armour while others might say it is too short and too slow while you fight enemies not so heavily armoured and will look for Wrath.
The 2nd part of my post was: it makes no sense to stubbornly prove your point and reserve yourself the right to be always correct, everyone has the right to hold his own opinion and possibly you might find this opinion justified if you'd take a minute to think instead of fighting.
Apologies if I didn't make it clear enough and you missed the point. In case you didn't and simply found it "not meaningful enough" - be it, it's your point of view. Some others maybe would find some meaning in it.