The Infantry Problem 2

[TerrorBite]

Regading inf being underpowered if you go to page 1 i think we said it isn't underpowered, but just too specialied in its roles to the extent it's not as fun or versatile. So without making it OP we were looking for ways to improve other aspects of it like more hp.

Careful with using words like we in this case, not everyone agrees with it. 
Even though you keep mentioning it, improving the infantry classes isn't limited to hp.

It was me that said that quote, not baron btw

Now MULTIPLE people did initially base comments along the lines of non-underpowered inf as the current state. Just look at woody's comments. The fun and versatility aspect was indirectly attained such as through leanderos comment on page 2. I could have said 'some of us' but if you actually rummage through all the bs and corrective comments like yours and this one, there is not much else. I also assumed others would throw in their own recollections of previous conclusions, so i didn't include everything.

Regarding the last part:

'we were looking'  for   'ways to improve other aspects of it'   LIKE   'more hp'
With the word groupings it should be easier to see that the 'we' was directed at investigating improvements and the 'more hp' was an example, so again I don't see any wording issues...

and for the record no one has had any arguments for or against extra hp iirc. So should I drop the idea because it has been essentially unnoticed?