(19-01-2018, 12:30 PM)Marius Wrote: That's the whole point, Winter, don't make a map that would be possible to spam. If a well organized, well equipt, with good communication team could do the same map more than once, I don't see the problem.
That is my point, though. I want maps to change so they aren't spammable, and your system will not prevent that. It is a neat system, but I'm not sure what the purpose is and how many people would actually take advantage of a higher loot rate on a map that is unpleasant to play on when it could be more efficient to spam an easier map with a lower loot rate. It is a layer of complexity for the Developer team to try to manage that, in my opinion, would not have the desired effects for most of the playerbase.
(19-01-2018, 12:51 PM)Woody Wrote: This is why im fine with the tokens in the tournaments but what the dev's I guess just don't get is most people think about there wealth before there dream loot so we will find not many people picking idk Steel Stinger even tho it's what they want. That's why I try to push my idea's of changing the loot system even tho they have added? the tournaments back
The Developer team gets it, we are not stupid and it has been brought up ad nauseum
Regardless of whether or not people pick legendary boots, it is still helping drive down the prices of ridiculously expensive/rare items. As far as not picking their dream loot, half of the tournament victors picked their dream items that would be nearly impossible to buy and are still using them. I don't really care what people do with their tournament rewards, though, as it is their item and it will likely still be a net benefit in moderating the proportion of different legendary items in game.The tournament, however, is irrelevant to the merit of the token idea. I think it still needs more discussion on the specifics and, once that is settled, the possible benefits.
I'm also moving this to the Feature Requests board now.