I would like to start with saying that I am not involved in the outcome of this matter in any way.
I have been watching this thread for a while now and the main problem I am seeing is trying to figure out whether the item, the Durendal afaik, was actually an item of Madjosh and whether this item was gifted or loaned to the bank.
I have seen OP delivering evidence of the purchase of the Durendal, 28th of March 2015, which I can confirm.
However I think it is more OPs problem for not providing evidence whether the Durendal was gifted to the bank or if it was loaned. Anyone could say a gifted item was once a loan to undo a donation.
Now I see that compensation for the lost item has been offered, yet has been refused. The value of the compensation compared to the value of a Durendal back in the day (March 2016) seems okayish to me, possibly more compensation has been offered then necessary, but whatever, you can't expect to get a compensation that matches the current value of a Durendal.
So did the bank did nothing wrong? Well, they could of course keep some administration, assuming they don't have it, seeing no evidence was provided regarding this matter. This way if one of the parties provided this evidence then this matter could be closed way sooner, but seeing no one is able to provide evidence about the cause of the item I will stand by; it's the problem of OP.
While selling stuff of others without their permission is forbidden, the example provided by Soviet actually contains evidence that the items provided to the player were indeed loaned, which I am failing to see in this thread.
Once again, this was posted as a spectators view and I am not involved in the outcome of this matter. It's just my concerns about this matter.
I have been watching this thread for a while now and the main problem I am seeing is trying to figure out whether the item, the Durendal afaik, was actually an item of Madjosh and whether this item was gifted or loaned to the bank.
I have seen OP delivering evidence of the purchase of the Durendal, 28th of March 2015, which I can confirm.
However I think it is more OPs problem for not providing evidence whether the Durendal was gifted to the bank or if it was loaned. Anyone could say a gifted item was once a loan to undo a donation.
Now I see that compensation for the lost item has been offered, yet has been refused. The value of the compensation compared to the value of a Durendal back in the day (March 2016) seems okayish to me, possibly more compensation has been offered then necessary, but whatever, you can't expect to get a compensation that matches the current value of a Durendal.
So did the bank did nothing wrong? Well, they could of course keep some administration, assuming they don't have it, seeing no evidence was provided regarding this matter. This way if one of the parties provided this evidence then this matter could be closed way sooner, but seeing no one is able to provide evidence about the cause of the item I will stand by; it's the problem of OP.
While selling stuff of others without their permission is forbidden, the example provided by Soviet actually contains evidence that the items provided to the player were indeed loaned, which I am failing to see in this thread.
Once again, this was posted as a spectators view and I am not involved in the outcome of this matter. It's just my concerns about this matter.