Application for the return of item left in house trust

[Kaasovic]

I have been watching this thread for a while now and the main problem I am seeing is trying to figure out whether the item, the Durendal afaik, was actually an item of Madjosh and whether this item was gifted or loaned to the bank.

I have seen OP delivering evidence of the purchase of the Durendal, 28th of March 2015, which I can confirm.

However I think it is more OPs problem for not providing evidence whether the Durendal was gifted to the bank or if it was loaned. Anyone could say a gifted item was once a loan to undo a donation.

Have you been watching this thread for a while? You seemingly missed this:

Here's the chat log (and apparently the chat history since then):

Code:

*** Chat begins 2018-02-25 00:30:43
...
<00:42:21> Woody: well idk care about paying a det
...

---

Now I see that compensation for the lost item has been offered, yet has been refused. The value of the compensation compared to the value of a Durendal back in the day (March 2016) seems okayish to me, possibly more compensation has been offered then necessary, but whatever, you can't expect to get a compensation that matches the current value of a Durendal.

I honestly hope you don't think those junk items are ample compensation for a Durendal, whatever your theoretical value of them may be.

---

While selling stuff of others without their permission is forbidden, the example provided by Soviet actually contains evidence that the items provided to the player were indeed loaned, which I am failing to see in this thread.

The example I provided shows someone being banned for selling items belonging to someone else. Woody referred to it as a de[b]t, so clearly he knew the item belongs to Madjosh.

I think we all know that Woody isn't the best in picking words, no offence, however it still doesn't change the fact that decisive evidence has been given.
While being in debt ("a state of being under obligation to pay or repay someone or something in return for something received"(debt)), could refer to a moral decision. According to Madjosh him self, a couple of posts back, he was a generous player that helped the bank take shape, could that be a reason why he is being compensated. Sorry, but without any contract being shown I find it hard to believe that the item was indeed a loan and was never supposed to be traded.
Isn't it common sense to setup a contract between two or more parties when an item is loaned to one other? Especially in NordInvasion where the community has some rats among them.

A compensation is an compensation. Value based it seems okay and at least an afford is made to compensate OP. With the item gone you can't honestly think one would magically appear do you? Oh and also, one man's junk is another man's treasure. Doesn't OP have only a few items in his possession now? This would at least be a nice new starting capital to build something up, or is he peer pressured by you and your emotional opinion to only get items you and your shopmates want?