Fix the market.

[Malong]

of those transactions put any value or evidence of Steel Stinger being 10 million. And only one of those four transactions even had Steel Stinger in it. Let's face reality, it's a weapon for a suboptimal class; 3 million gold seems about right.

What a good little straw man.


This full thread is about a gold problem of people giving a bigger and bigger discount to people that have gold for there crap or good product. Like I said in one of my posts I don't care if it's "value" is 3m. 

I'm fine with the value of Steel Stinger being "3.2m" but what I don't like is seeing is the Griffon Bascinet effect. When the better red item is less/the same/or not much more than the crafted item when upgrading it costs itself x (idk). 

I care about how the gold discount has turned into lets says from 5-10% into Y%. (That % is just an example the Y is a growing one)

The trades are showing not long ago people were paying a lot more than 3m in "value" for either steel stinger or rw. I'm sure someone that either doesn't have 3m gold or even does would pay closer to the prices I've shown if paying avg stuff.

I'm sure we could ask habor how much some would need to pay in stuff for it.

I'm guessing you don't know what a straw man argument is. But hey, let's be condescending when I'm directly raising doubt on your statement below, which is the literal opposite of a straw man fallacy. Good job, yet again.

I would guess most people value [Steel Stinger] over "10m" yet putting it this low and it still won't sell is something ells.

This full thread is about a gold problem of people giving a bigger and bigger discount to people that have gold for there crap or good product. Like I said in one of my posts I don't care if it's "value" is 3m. 

I'm fine with the value of Steel Stinger being "3.2m" but what I don't like is seeing is the Griffon Bascinet effect. When the better red item is less/the same/or not much more than the crafted item when upgrading it costs itself x (idk). 

I glossed over that quoted sentence ("When the better red item is less/the same/or not much more than the crafted item when upgrading it costs itself x (idk).") because I was being nice. But if you want to play that way, it seriously makes no sense. No really, read it aloud. I have no idea what you were trying to accomplish typing that the first nor second time.

But anyway, it's not a "discount;" it strictly dictates the value by the standard of gold. It's just deflation.

I care about how the gold discount has turned into lets says from 5-10% into Y%. (That % is just an example the Y is a growing one)

The trades are showing not long ago people were paying a lot more than 3m in "value" for either steel stinger or rw. I'm sure someone that either doesn't have 3m gold or even does would pay closer to the prices I've shown if paying avg stuff.

This implies that its "value" would be traded more highly if only items are involved. As items have no strict value, there is no comparison to gold unless you eliminate all variables to include just one item and just gold. That didn't happen in any of those transactions.