(17-12-2011, 12:45 AM)Leesin link Wrote: Can you quote the part in my post where I mentioned "Constantly" and can you bring up a valid point to why Infantry shouldn't have better armour than Archers, before you try to act all "Chuck Norris superior" when you clearly don't even have the chest hair for me to rip off.
Yeah, sorry, I read your comment, like not at all. Apologies.
Tell me though, how are you, as infantry, affected by the fact that archers can wear the same armor? We have 2 power strike as heavy longbowmen, so if we get into melee with anything that wears at least a mail armor, we have hard time killing it. Our only way to kill ppl is, surprise, bow. Armor helps us survive the hits from Nord archers and xbowmen, and if we get into melee, buys us enough time for infantry to save our asses.
I don't really understand why you'd complain about this, we are all on the same team, the more hits every class can take, the better for you as well.
Goddamit, you as infantry even get native Morning star. How can you even complain about archers? And it's not like you are stuck with infatry tree anyway. The level cap will be 52, so you can have one class maxed and another class at 2nd level. What stops you from taking as infatry a level in cavalry tree to get a horse? Or level in archery so you can shoot the peasants before they get to you?
I mean, with those possibilities in the game, I just don't understand this at all.