Different model for black armor

[Deer]

Both armors presented by Deer look terrible at the part where the boots connect to the leg part of the armor.
Doesnt really fit well with any boots in NI as far as I know.

Besides taht they are just recolors of the plate armour in the first Mount&Blade and if they are not changed/not different from the version in cRappyG the back part looks really terrible.

i think i said that was my point... they are basically just recolors of the black armor, but there are obviously more changes than just that.
and have you seen the way that black armor looks at the boots?
shut up

[Mr.Peso]

Ohoho, someone seems like he doesn't like unpleasant opinions.
I'm not talking about it's a recolor of the black armour, I said that theese armors are slightly recolored versions of the Heavy Plate Armor of Mount&Blade 1.
And again, boot part terrible, back part terrible (Giant empty black stripe when aiming down/bending over in any way on the first one), chainmail terrible, general texture detail very low...
shall I continue? The secong one looks slightly better, at least it doesn't have the chest texture that has the issues at the back.

[Deer]

how are you going to tell me that these :

Black Armor Option One

[Image: 1024x575.resizedimage][Image: 1024x575.resizedimage]

Black Armor Option Two

[Image: 1024x575.resizedimage][Image: 1024x575.resizedimage]

are not a retexture/ model changes of this:

Spoiler

[Image: milanese-1.jpg]

and

Spoiler

[Image: Black_Armor.png]

also...they look better than the current model...which it that one ^
so, it's not that i don't like your opinion, i just don't see why you had to come in here and say things that are wrong AND then say that you think the armor looks bad

[Sargent Q]

Could you get some screen shots of those options with better lighting?  I cannot tell what they are supposed to look like in that lighting.

[Mr.Peso]

I was primarily talking about the first armor which is clearly not a retexture of the black armor but a basic copy of the Heavy Plate armor of MountBlade I.
The secong one just looks pretty terribly made to me as the chainmail on the lower body looks very bad (at least from what I can see in that lighting setting).

Also I don't know why you think pointing out issues with the models is something you have to get mad about.

[Deer]

because they look similar to, yet better than the current model; which looks much worse in areas that you pointed out as bad on those armors

and i saw no point in yr post

[Mr.Peso]

Well, seems like we have different opinions about those models. Guess I'm fine with that, no need to argue anymore since I got
no influence on any decisions anyway.
Have a nice evening/day, depending on it what timezone you are ;-)

[kingbigb2]

Could you get some screen shots of those options with better lighting?  I cannot tell what they are supposed to look like in that lighting.

Here ya go.

Number one

Spoiler

[Image: 52e0e33a0c907e69a353a1d9bd7b3987.png]

Number two

Spoiler

[Image: a89d019cedc77177d341c90ab96d055c.png]

The cool looking armor maroon posted is Black Gothic armor. At least in the game files.

[Maroon]

I thought this was Royal Guard legendary armour.

Anyways I'd say Deer's option 1 would be pretty damn awesome replacement

If it is, I have no idea. Never seen it in-game, and it's been in the files since 0.5.0 . It could have been made legendary with the newest patch though.

[Nka19]

[quote author=Nka19 link=topic=34004.msg203437#msg203437 date=1413917208]
I thought this was Royal Guard legendary armour.

Anyways I'd say Deer's option 1 would be pretty damn awesome replacement

If it is, I have no idea. Never seen it in-game, and it's been in the files since 0.5.0 . It could have been made legendary with the newest patch though.
[/quote]
Yah, well I was only using logic. Armor looking like that, can only be legandary. Tho xbow walking around with it would be weird imo, suits commandos more.