(04-12-2017, 12:06 AM)Sir Baron Wrote: I know it's trying to prove a point but this
Terrerbite on page 12
"well shielders/inf currently are being used, isn't the issue more that they cant do much else (surplus inf sitting around waiting for admin to tell them to be useful)?"-TerrerBite on page 12
Kind of under mines it
He just said that there are to many yet says that this would force people to play Infantry
Not really. Giving people shielding to do when they don't want to shield because it is not fun or engaging is not a great way to fix the class. He also wasn't saying that this would force people to play infantry in the hypothetical situation, he was saying, as I just explained, "just because a class is necessary to win does not mean it is an engaging or good class to play."
(04-12-2017, 12:06 AM)Sir Baron Wrote: Finally someone asks that
The reason is simple
It won't but you can slash over SHC's giving Infantry something to do
It is also a lot easier to change a cade line of SHC's then just a set of 10 walls if a shielder joins
I disagree on the first point completely. I am having flashbacks of all the commands and red text (not to mention reports) to infantry trying to slash over Short Heavy Barricades when the team fully walled off... "_____ stop destroying the barricades!!!!!!1!!!!one!!!!!"