Change orange legendaries

[Malong]

I do but once again you are being petty. I deleted it because it's not relevant which you have not disagreed with.

Stop lying (and this is another instance of people catching you lying)! If you understood how double quotes work, you would not have posted this:

I don't care how low prices get but i do care about it going lower than crafting costs."

Ye, I agree. A. B. and C. help with the "going lower than crafting costs".

Do you really think you are convincing anyone otherwise? And do you really think it's petty when someone points out your egregious reading comprehension issues?

How are Reds worth more than Oranges. See above for my reasoning.

Because, yet again, for the most part, orange legendaries are superseded by red legendaries:

The progression and antiquation of items is a feature, not a bug, of online RPGs.

If you view them as the same or similar values I would say this.

I could not care less if [Reds and Oranges] was only 2x ish the price of the house crafting version. I don't care how low prices get but i do care about it going lower than crafting costs.

We agree on that. You suggested somthing should be done.

Holy fucking shit! No we don't agree! I was pointing out that the quoted text was absurd! Does it still sound like we agree? And this is in the same post where you claim you understand that quotation marks denote a quote!

And if you bothered to search for that quote, you would have found the original source, which was your post in a locked thread (I hope you would agree with your post). Just read it aloud. Does it sound like the semantics I would use? Would I type "2x ish" instead of "about double?" Would I type "but I do care" instead of "but I care?" Would I type "[prices] going lower than crafting costs" instead of "prices decrease below the level of their corresponding house craftable?" The answer to all three is a resounding "No, it sounds like the phrasing someone would use if their reading level was at the rudimentary level of phonetically reading words individually."

Here is the THIRD ATTEMPT (and it's an _attempt_ because you can't read) explanation:

It was meant to show the absurdity of the post to which I was replying this means some text is coming soon to which I want to reply, not that it's my actual reply this upcoming quote is what I am claiming is absurd, particularly this:

this is an open double quotation mark, everything after this mark until the next such mark is, as the dictionary defines it, a group of words taken from a text or speech and repeated by someone other than the original author or speaker ---> "THIS is the part that I am stating is absurd ---> Each legendary has a baseline[;] I could not care less if [everything] was only 2x ish the price of the house crafting version. I don't care how low prices get but i do care about it going lower than crafting costs." <--- this is the corresponding closing double quotation mark; everything encapsulated within the two marks is that aforementioned definition of the word 'quotation'

Put yourself together man and see we agree something should be done.

I've suggested 3 basic idea's and the 1 you suggested falls under one of mine... Face It's you agreed somthing should be done.

Yet again, another Woody-level malapropism ("pull yourself together," amusingly Googling for "put yourself together" even corrects itself to this). And no, we don't agree! Get off the forums and read a damn book!