So? Now we have it twice.
Anyways, +1 Blessed Excalibur.
(01-09-2019, 09:39 PM)Julia. Wrote: [ -> ]So? Now we have it twice.
Anyways, +1 Blessed Excalibur.
So redundant information is not useful. I don't know why I have to explain this.
(01-09-2019, 09:45 PM)Malong Wrote: [ -> ] (01-09-2019, 09:39 PM)Julia. Wrote: [ -> ]So? Now we have it twice.
Anyways, +1 Blessed Excalibur.
So redundant information is not useful. I don't know why I have to explain this.
Actually my timestamp is earlier than your post, even if your post is above mine. I guess it was posted more or less at the same time. I am aware that posting stuff twice does not give additional information, yet it does not hurt anyone.
(01-09-2019, 09:57 PM)Julia. Wrote: [ -> ]Actually my timestamp is earlier than your post, even if your post is above mine.
100% wrong! Incoming "5:16 PM is earlier than 5:15 PM" (adjust for your time zone) to replace "15 days is 4 weeks."
Or just look at the epoch time stamps from the forum:
(01-09-2019, 10:17 PM)Peleus Wrote: [ -> ]High quality arguing
Yes, I love to bring up evidence that goes against my points.
Just saying that that's how it said that for me, discussing this won't help anyways.
(01-09-2019, 10:22 PM)Julia. Wrote: [ -> ]Just saying that that's how it said that for me, discussing this won't help anyways.
Now I'm genuinely curious. Could we please see how the time stamps appear for you? If they do appear differently, then we should file a bug with MyBB.