10-04-2012, 01:55 PM
Why does it require 80k XP total to get man at arms? Every other class has now been normalized to 2.5, 8, 60, 150k for classes. Why is Man at Arms the only exception? Is this just an oversight or what?
|
Man at Arms XP
|
10-04-2012, 02:22 PM
Agreed, 20k/40k seems more appriopriate. I think it was indeed an oversight.
10-04-2012, 02:25 PM
Thanks for pointing this out. Wait for the devs to see this and respond.
"And it goes a little something like this..."
10-04-2012, 03:23 PM
Literally just looked at this myself and thought the same
Nothing is impossible, it's just a matter of determination and probability.
2nd Knight forever! No longer active.
12-04-2012, 02:27 PM
Just turned level 24 with 10 class points left. Stats are:
Melee: 18187 xp Ranged: 35230 xp While you need: 30000 Melee XP 50000 Ranged XP It's wrong I tell you!
12-04-2012, 02:48 PM
20k melee and 40k range would seem more reasonable
,though it might be the new 'cav'.
Nothing is impossible, it's just a matter of determination and probability.
2nd Knight forever! No longer active.
14-04-2012, 01:17 AM
It's been a while, anybody find out whether this is intentional/getting changed or not?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)