Posts: 23
Threads: 8
Joined: Apr 2012
13-04-2012, 11:57 AM
(This post was last modified: 13-04-2012, 12:07 PM by Fatalerror.)
Posts: 587
Threads: 217
Joined: Feb 2012
A class with good 2h skill would be nice but i dont think the name Swadian Knight would fit, because a knight is on a horse
Posts: 233
Threads: 9
Joined: Dec 2011
Why the hell do you want to reduce 2h wpf for commando?
This class is already limited in his action on battlefield, they have no ranged weapons, if they can't use efficiently a 2h or a pole what will they do? Only shield meat?
No no, do what you want with swadian knight but don't touch commando!
[URL=http://"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2W4FsDVKMY"]"Tu vois, le monde se divise en deux catégories, ceux qui ont un pistolet chargé et ceux qui creusent. Toi tu creuse. "[/URL]
Posts: 23
Threads: 8
Joined: Apr 2012
The ability only in the Commandos reduced two-handed weapon, because that scenario Commandos + Heavy Guard will be too great two-handed weapon skill, as well as to stimulate the Commandos to add features to enhance the two-handed weapon is Guardian and Heavy Guard.
As for the title "Swadian Knight", then you need to think over it. I think you can come up with a more interesting class name.
Posts: 449
Threads: 46
Joined: Jan 1970
I don't think having +20 proficiency as a Knight/Heavy Infantry (190) as opposed to a current vanilla commando (170) really justifies having another class, and nerfing commando.
If anything, I think it should be a subspecialty class after becoming a Commando.
Posts: 1,787
Threads: 116
Joined: Jan 1970
Irrelevant now. Locking.
Give a man a fish, and you have fed him for a day. Teach him how to fish, and he will continue fishing even if you give him a fish.
- Fingus