Ragnarok requirement level

[bossculeur]

[quote author=bossculeur link=topic=23179.msg166382#msg166382 date=1392677611]
[quote author=Malong link=topic=23179.msg166358#msg166358 date=1392666401]
We mostly leave when one of the people in TS could not join due to someone else getting a spot in the server. The "anyone you don't deem 'worthy'" part should really be amended to the people that follow us around to troll, and that list is quite small (started with only two or three people). This practice is pretty new for us, and you have even been present many times for runs as recently as one month ago when we stayed despite the presence of certain players we would not have preferred to play with.

PCK, in regards to these quotes, are you implying that the practice of server bombing by "your" (hahahahahaha) group has only been going on for a month or two? We started doing that back in June, soon after 0.5.0 came out. The group of players has changed a bit since then but it was the same core. It seems as though you may be talking about something else but if so I missed your point. Now carry on, entertain me!
[/quote]
You should recall I was in some of those same runs back in June (albeit not many and not regularly). But the new method, so to speak, refers to joining with a set 17. Back then we would just join, with no AFK check, no countdown, no coordination on connection, and just say "___ spots left" telling others to join in. In this time, people rarely ever left when we did not have a set group in the server. Also, I kept typing "my group" (with quotes) because that is how another poster phrased it. Please read more carefully in the future.
[/quote]

It's not a huge deal but we actually were doing server bombs with 16/17 people in ts very frequently (almost every evening) back then. Coordinated connection, countdowns, etc. were all being done. We would also do the leave/rejoin when there was someone we didn't want to play with. Winter or anyone else that participated can confirm this.

You misunderstood at my laughing at the use of "your". I wasn't mocking your use of it, just the use of it in general. I can see how that may have been unclear.