Nord Invasion in Bannerlord

[Malong]

It makes complete sense... if you're going to be the only individual getting the loot, the chance needs to be reduced or you're going to damage the market through effectively no real competition.

If you're kiting, and you get lots of mats compared to a team that has to spread it out among 16 people, you have the most power to negatively affect the economy through setting the prices

You either didn't read or wanted to ignore the counterpoints since you brought up the exact same argument that has been countered and never refuted. To reiterate:

Beyond that, the complaint that solo players received all the rewards from their kills is and was always nonsensical. If any player does all the work and killing, they should have gotten all the rewards from their kills. But for some reason, this logic doesn't carry over to NI, and the borderline envy of the players that were able to handle bots on their own without other players somehow won out.

[T]he reward is based on the task, and the sum of rewards is not based on the number of contributors. In other words, if you perform a task individually or with a group, adding more people does not increase the total reward. If take on a contract to complete a project, your employer does not care how large your project team is, you get rewarded at a rate specified in your agreement.

IBT "well that's life and this is a game," you strive for realism in other aspects of this mod (e.g. "small groups of players should not be able to defeat gods"), and it's not like the action of loading NI makes us logic-less Swadians.

TLDR: "If N players can accomplish the same as M players, the reward should be the same, regardless of if N != M"

As for the market, supply, and competition: that is only a factor if the number of materials dropped to kiting players matches or surpasses those of non-kiting servers. Only then could there be a possibility. There has never been any evidence of this being the case. In its current state, deciding to play with fewer or more players is a simple calculation of expected value. Being that there are far more instances of events and fuller public servers, this does not appear to be the case.

...you should do it for the fun and challenge not as a method of making money. 

You shouldn't dictate what other players do for fun. For the record, I don't kite, and I don't play for rewards. But there are plenty of reasons people play the game, but I would guess that most play for loot. You are essentially saying that the reason most people play is invalid.

You can use the flawed argument that everyone who doesn't agree with you is essentially "jealous of my wealth" but its no way to run a game economy.

That wasn't even the argument. It's that there's some very illogical viewpoint that: "these few players can accomplish as much as our 16 players, so they should get less." The reward system already favors the latter group to the point that it's barely based on any merit. Where does anyone get equal rewards regardless of effort and ability, or that more capable people get their rewards handicapped?