New concept of archers

[DR.]

Would the Community really prosper from a potential fourth Archer class though? Considering how Archers usually dominate on the battlefield, how would this be balanced for infantry?

Warden. Warden is what comes to mind when most people hear Sniper/Archer.

Leg. Leg is becoming what comes to mind when most people hear Inf/Comando.

Senti Sentry Ranger and Zwei Jugg (maybe Rg) all need help in some way to become relevant. Don't be blind-sighted by 1 class... that's not the full story here.

As pointed out in a different thread Jugg in 1h skill is the same as Senti. Does this mean Jugg is op or does this mean Senti utter garbage as a "1h" hero?

I could go on to point out more but I don't think it's needed.

That's it. The archers is imbalanced. I propose to keep only the single quick class Archer, with this style of play, what players now - quick, agile, prompt. One class, in my opinion should be heavy and slow longbowman. And I think that he can make a bow with two modes of fire, as  Woody wanted. The third class is a Ranger with good health and abilities Sentry and Sentynel. He also inherits their legendary and their weapons. And the fourth class is now possible to think about. I see archers that way because it makes sense. They will all be different and each will have its own feature. If this is implemented, then I will finally be able to make a character Archer. What are archers now leading me to exclamations like "WTF?"

Warden is a bow/arrows class 1st
Senti is a 1h class 1st
Sentry is a 2h class 1st
Ranger is an armour class 1st


If Ranger and [X] become one class you will make the people that picked that class over the others unhappy. Ranger will no longer be an armour class but an amalgamation with lesser stats in [X] fields.