Actually achievable new game mode.

[Forward]

None of your examples require several cade spots. 

Sorry If I did not outline the best strategy If it was not obvious? Tell me whats the meta again? To be as close to the bots spawn as possible? Yea? 

If wave 1-3 Is on one side of the map and 4-6 Is on the other Is It not optimal to fucking move for once lol... What are you going to wait In the middle of the map? A lot of cade spots I can think of don't back into a wall so It's not even going to end well... 

A lot of maps we play atm have the cade area In the middle of the map out In the open. If you caded the same way we do on all maps atm the bots would come from behind you at some point. Some maps would work just about the same still but the same cade spot may not be optimal.  


Take this cade spot for example https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/u...0F639095C/

If the bots came from that spawn on wave 1-3 well everything Is going well but what happens when 4-6 Is behind us?  

There are already maps where we played with multiple cades spots sometimes: Unusdaq, Offshore, Hell, Yalen. 

We have never had anything like what I'm suggesting.  

I can't say that it's more difficult. 

If the risk is higher the difficulty is higher. Also, you will have fewer cades given you will need to split them up. 

But for me it would not make the game more fun, just more loot for being a slower, like cavalry mode, which I dislike.

Cav is not for some people the same way with kiting Is not for some people. Hell, kiting takes longer and It's not even as rewarding as normal gameplay with a full team yet lots of people do It.

I see no difficulty in changing cade spot according to bots spawns, only time waste. And in your example with Nordic Village, I would just caded the ramp (to right from you screenshot view) and had 1 cading spot from all directions.

The meta of this proposed mode is already solved, so not interesting.

On top of it, the idea of having less cades is just not working if you remember build points fiasco.